A new bill under discussion in the Florida Senate could authorize citizens who feel their privacy is being threatened to use “reasonable force” to take down drones that invade their property. However, this proposal is sparking legal debate and could trigger a conflict with federal aviation regulations, potentially raising concerns for public safety.
The measure primarily focuses on regulating the use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) and seeks to expand the no-fly zones for these aircraft across the state, including sensitive areas such as airports and correctional facilities.
The draft legislation introduces a legal gray area regarding the rights of both property owners and drone pilots. According to federal regulations, it is legal to fly over private residential areas as long as the aircraft remains in unrestricted airspace. However, if the drone flies too low or causes a nuisance, the pilot could be prosecuted for trespassing or, in more serious cases, stalking. At the state level, a 2024 law known as the “Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act” already prohibits drones from capturing photos or videos of private property without authorization.
If the bill is approved, citizens would have the right to take down suspicious devices over their homes, though the definition of “reasonable force” remains vague. This leaves room for interpretation and raises the risk of conflict between Florida law and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the agency responsible for regulating and overseeing all aspects of civil aviation in the United States. Federal rules prohibit interfering with an aircraft in flight, with penalties that can include hefty fines and up to five years in prison.
The Federal Aviation Administration has reiterated that it is both illegal and dangerous to strike an aircraft in motion, including unmanned vehicles. Although the bill does not explicitly authorize the use of firearms, concerns are growing about how the provision might be interpreted.
While not yet finalized, the measure has already stirred significant controversy. Many fear it could encourage dangerous behavior, particularly considering the already permissive stance on projectile weapons in Florida. Furthermore, it could trigger a domino effect, with other states potentially adopting similar laws, leading to a fragmented regulatory landscape.
The adoption of the measure, which has passed through several committees without significant opposition, could represent a crucial step in regulating these aerial devices in an age of increasing technological surveillance. If approved, it is expected to go into effect in October 2025.
