Republican Representative Nicole Malliotakis from Staten Island and Democratic Representative Josh Gottheimer from New Jersey are intensifying their opposition to New York City’s controversial congestion pricing plan. Their unified stance establishes a bipartisan effort to amend federal legislation that could impact toll road and express lane programs.
The congestion pricing plan, which aims to charge a $15 fee for cars entering Manhattan south of 60th Street, has more than sparked debate, it has infuriated segments of the public–especially commuters– since its announcement. Proponents argue it will ease traffic congestion and reduce emissions, but critics view it as an unfair financial burden that would disproportionately affect those coming into Manhattan from outer boroughs and neighboring states. The start date, which has finally been established as June 30, was just announced today, a clear indication that the protests are having little effect.
“The MTA’s Congestion Pricing Plan is nothing more than a cash grab that will take more money from commuters,” Malliotakis stated during a recent interview, reflecting the frustrations of many who believe the plan will push traffic to other areas, worsening conditions and increasing pollution, especially in minority communities.
Gottheimer, echoing Malliotakis’ sentiments at a press conference outside MTA headquarters, criticized the lack of transparency in how the revenue estimates were calculated. “The mismanaged MTA’s Congestion Tax…will lead to more traffic, pollution, and financial heartache for Jersey and New York families. That’s exactly why we’re introducing legislation at the federal level to stop it,” he declared.
Their opposition is backed by a Siena College poll showing that nearly two-thirds of New Yorkers oppose the toll, despite the state’s previous approval under former Governor Andrew Cuomo. The current governor, Kathy Hochul, supports the initiative as a means to improve transportation infrastructure and environmental conditions in Manhattan.
The public’s resistance and the bipartisan legislative push reflect a broader discontent with urban tolling policies that many perceive as punitive rather than problem-solving. As Malliotakis put it, “It’s very unfortunate that these elected officials who represent New York are not listening to the will of the people who can’t afford to live in the city.”
With legal challenges mounting and political pressure increasing, the future of the congestion pricing scheme remains uncertain. As the debate continues, the voices of those like Malliotakis and Gottheimer play a crucial role in shaping the discourse around urban transportation policies and their socio-economic impacts.R
